Five Organizations Worth Your Support in the Fight to Defend Elections

Make a Difference with a Strategic Donation

Recognizing the Pattern

American democracy is under legal siege. From federal attempts to seize state voter rolls, to redistricting battles that dilute minority voting power, to lawsuits challenging the administration of elections themselves, the courtrooms of this country have become the front lines of the fight for free and fair elections.

Winning those battles requires money, lawyers, and organizations with the institutional knowledge and track record to show up and win.

The scale of the assault has grown dramatically. As of mid-2026, the Trump administration’s Department of Justice has sued 30 states and Washington, D.C., demanding that they hand over unredacted voter registration files containing Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and other highly sensitive personal information.

Minnesota is one of those states. The stated justification is voter roll maintenance. The real concern among election law experts is the creation of a national voter surveillance infrastructure with no clear limiting principle.

The voter data campaign is only one front. A parallel and equally familiar tactic is the coordinated attack on legitimate election administration practices, reframing normal, lawful processes as evidence of fraud. It happened in California, where the June 3, 2026 primary for governor and Los Angeles mayor took weeks to fully count. California law allows mail ballots to be counted if postmarked by Election Day and received within a week after it, a practice used for decades and audited extensively.

Roughly a quarter of California voters drop off their ballots on or near Election Day, which means results shift as those ballots are counted in the days that follow. This is not a flaw. It is the system working as designed. Yet within hours of polls closing, President Trump claimed without evidence that Democrats were trying to steal the races and that the votes were under federal investigation.

The pattern is the point: attack the count before it finishes, erode public confidence in the result, and create a predicate for future litigation or legislative restriction. Mail-in voting fraud, by every rigorous measure, is vanishingly rare. The California episode is a template, not an anomaly, and it will be deployed again in November.

Here is the important counterpoint: the organizations defending elections are winning. By late May 2026, federal courts had dismissed DOJ voter data lawsuits in eight separate states – California, Oregon, Michigan, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Maine – with judges repeatedly warning that the administration has stretched federal law beyond its intended purpose and that the demands threaten voter privacy and participation. The legal resistance is working, and the organizations profiled below are at the center of it.

One additional resource worth knowing about, not a donation destination but an indispensable tool for anyone following these battles in real time, is Democracy Docket (democracydocket.com), the election law tracking platform founded by attorney Marc Elias. Democracy Docket monitors and publishes every significant election lawsuit filed across the country, providing plain-language analysis of what is being argued, what courts have decided, and what is at stake. It is the most comprehensive public window into the litigation landscape described in this article, and subscribing to their free newsletter is one of the easiest ways to stay informed about threats to elections as they develop. If you are moved to support their work financially, they accept donations as well.

The good news: these organizations exist. They are financially transparent, highly rated by independent watchdogs, and actively engaged in the legal fights that matter most. Here are five worth your serious consideration.

1. Campaign Legal Center

Charity Navigator score: 100% — Perfect

Program expense ratio: High | campaignlegal.org

If you want your money to go to the most rigorously accountable election law organization in the country, Campaign Legal Center is your answer. A perfect score of 100 out of 100 on Charity Navigator is extraordinarily rare. CLC has earned it.

Campaign Legal Center uses litigation and policy advocacy to fight for every American’s right to participate in the democratic process. Their work spans four critical areas: voting rights, redistricting, money in politics, and government ethics. They are strictly nonpartisan, meaning their legal victories are durable across political administrations and harder to dismiss in court as partisan advocacy.

What makes CLC especially valuable right now is their depth of expertise in campaign finance and redistricting law, two areas where the rules being set today will shape elections for decades. They have supported the enactment of state voting rights acts, challenged illegal gerrymandering, and fought to keep dark money out of elections. They have been active in Minnesota and across the country.

Why give here: The perfect accountability score combined with a laser focus on election law makes this the most efficient vehicle for putting dollars directly into courtroom work that defends the structure of democracy itself.

2. ACLU of Minnesota Foundation

Charity Navigator: 4/4 Stars — 98% score

Program expense ratio: 83% | aclu-mn.org

If your goal is to defend elections specifically in Minnesota, there is no more directly effective organization than the ACLU of Minnesota Foundation. They are in the fight right now.

When the Trump administration’s Department of Justice filed suit against Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon in September 2025, demanding the state hand over its entire voter registration database, including partial Social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers, the ACLU of Minnesota stepped forward as legal counsel. Representing the League of Women Voters Minnesota, Common Cause, and two Minnesota voters with past felony convictions, the ACLU Voting Rights Project and ACLU of Minnesota filed a motion to intervene as defendants. A separate intervenor, the Minnesota Alliance for Retired Americans Educational Fund, joined the case with its own counsel. The court granted intervention to all parties in January 2026, and the ACLU is standing between Minnesota voters and that federal data grab in federal court today.

This is not a peripheral role. The ACLU is the primary legal team for the largest group of intervenors in the case, and a motion to dismiss the DOJ’s case was heard in early 2026. Those suits have not succeeded anywhere. By late May 2026, federal judges had dismissed similar DOJ cases in eight states, with pointed language about executive overreach and threats to voter privacy.

The ACLU-MN has also successfully defended the Restore the Vote law before the Minnesota Supreme Court, which restored voting rights to people on probation. For decades, they have been a consistent legal presence defending Minnesota’s election laws against challenges.

When you donate to the ACLU of Minnesota Foundation specifically, not the national ACLU, your money stays in Minnesota, funding the attorneys and litigation directly defending your state’s elections. With 83 cents of every dollar going directly to programs, it is a highly efficient organization.

Why give here: No other organization combines this level of financial accountability with this degree of direct, active, in-state Minnesota election litigation. This is the most targeted option for Minnesotans who want to protect their own elections.

3. League of Women Voters Education Fund

Charity Navigator: 4/4 Stars (national)

Program expense ratio: 85% | lwvmn.org / lwv.org

Founded in 1920 in the wake of women’s suffrage, the League of Women Voters has over a century of experience as the most trusted nonpartisan voice in American civic life. Their Education Fund is the 501(c)(3) arm that conducts voter education, research, and, critically, legal advocacy.

The League of Women Voters of Minnesota is a named party in the federal lawsuit over Minnesota’s voter registration data, having intervened as a defendant in late 2025 alongside Common Cause and individual voters, represented by the ACLU of Minnesota. This is not a passive organization. They show up in court when it matters.

Beyond litigation, the League operates VOTE411.org, a nonpartisan voter information platform used by millions of Americans every election cycle, and they conduct candidate forums and voter registration drives in every corner of Minnesota. Their infrastructure spans all 87 Minnesota counties.

There is an important distinction worth making: donating to the LWV Minnesota chapter keeps your money in-state, while donating to the LWV Education Fund nationally supports the broader litigation infrastructure. Both are worthy. The national Education Fund carries a program expense ratio of 85% and a GuideStar Platinum Seal of Transparency, the highest available.

Why give here: If you want your contribution to defend elections while also investing in the civic infrastructure, voter education, access, and engagement that make elections worth defending in the first place, the League represents unmatched depth and history.

4. Common Cause Education Fund

Charity Navigator: 4/4 Stars

Program expense ratio: 85% | commoncause.org/minnesota

Common Cause has been fighting for honest, open, and accountable government for over 50 years. Their Education Fund, the tax-deductible 501(c)(3) arm, combines litigation with policy advocacy and public education in a way that is uniquely strategic: they work to prevent bad election laws from passing in the first place, which is almost always cheaper and more effective than litigating against them after the fact.

Common Cause Minnesota is a named defendant-intervenor in the federal DOJ voter data lawsuit, standing alongside the League of Women Voters of Minnesota and individual Minnesota voters to protect the privacy and security of every voter in the state. They have skin in this game at the highest level. Common Cause has also filed its own separate federal lawsuit directly against the Department of Justice challenging the voter data demands nationally, which means they are fighting on two fronts simultaneously.

They were also instrumental in the passage of the Minnesota Voting Rights Act in 2024, which codified protections for communities of color and historically disenfranchised groups, a landmark achievement that will protect Minnesota elections for years to come.

With a program expense ratio of 85%, Common Cause is among the most financially efficient organizations in this group. They operate as a national network with state chapters, meaning a donation to Common Cause Minnesota supports both local advocacy and the national legal infrastructure that backs it up.

Why give here: Common Cause is the best option for donors who believe that the most powerful defense of elections is a combination of legal action and policy prevention, stopping threats before they reach the courtroom while also fighting them when they do. Right now, they are doing both.

5. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

Charity Navigator: 4/4 Stars — 98% score

Program expense ratio: 67% | naacpldf.org

Founded in 1940 by Thurgood Marshall, the architect of Brown v. Board of Education and future Supreme Court Justice, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund has argued more cases before the United States Supreme Court than any organization except the U.S. Department of Justice. That institutional knowledge and legal firepower is irreplaceable when election cases reach the highest courts in the land.

The LDF was directly involved in the passage of Minnesota’s Voting Rights Act in 2024, which provides specific protections for communities of color and ensures that election laws cannot be used to dilute minority voting power. They deploy legal resources nationally to states including Minnesota when voting rights are threatened, and they are frequently the organization in the room when the stakes are highest.

The LDF’s program expense ratio of 67% is the lowest in this group, and it is worth understanding why. As a litigation-heavy organization with a large, experienced legal staff and extensive Supreme Court practice, their attorney costs are substantial, and those attorneys are their core product. Their fundraising efficiency is exceptional, spending only $0.10 to raise every dollar contributed.

Why give here: If you believe that protecting the voting rights of communities of color is inseparable from protecting democracy itself, and history strongly suggests it is, the LDF is the organization with the deepest legal bench and the longest track record of winning the fights that define American democracy.

A Final Word: Why These Five, Why Now

Democracy is not self-defending. The legal architecture that protects free and fair elections, voting rights, equal representation, protection from voter suppression, and the integrity of election administration exists because generations of lawyers, advocates, and donors made it exist, and continue to defend it in court every single day.

The scope of the current threat is historic. The federal government has sued 30 states in a coordinated effort to consolidate control over voter data and, by extension, over who gets to vote and under what conditions. Minnesota is squarely in that fight.

But here is what matters: courts are pushing back. By late May 2026, federal judges in eight states had dismissed these cases, citing executive overreach and threats to voter participation. The organizations profiled here are winning, and they need your support to keep winning.

These five organizations have earned the right to your trust through decades of work, transparent finances, and demonstrated results. They are not ideological abstractions. They are the people standing between your vote and those who wish to diminish it.

CALL TO ACTION:

Your contribution, at whatever level, makes the work of these organizations possible. These organizations are fighting for something that belongs to all of us.

Ratings sourced from Charity Navigator (charitynavigator.org) and GuideStar/Candid, based on most recent available IRS Form 990 data. Lawsuit status based on Democracy Docket (democracydocket.com), the Brennan Center for Justice, the State Democracy Research Initiative, and public court records as of June 2026.